Big Al
10-14-2008, 07:38 AM
Original post (http://www.lpsg.org/101710-non-believers-on-pe-forum.html)
I find it amusing that the word ‘medicine,’ is being linked with PE, when in fact medicine has nothing to do with PE. Medicines, or drugs are preparations for the treatment or prevention of disease and illness (check your dictionaries) and by and large produced under license. The pills and potions claimed to assist in developing a bigger cock are none of these and could be manufactured under the kitchen table as far as anyone’s concerned. The idea of PE is to increase the size of your cock, or put another way, a physical procedure to increase the matter, which is achieved by some form of tension being applied to the cock itself. Perhaps, it’s realisation of it being outside the realms of medicine that prevents pharmaceutical companies becoming involved?
As for the world of medicine, it’s a huge field. You develop a problem, you visit you GP, but he doesn’t know it all? Otherwise he would cure everything there and then in his surgery, but often he’ll refer you to a specialist. When it comes to PE however, there are no specialists; true there are surgeons willing to perform procedures with the hope of increasing your size, but they’re not specialists in PE as we know it. What we do know from contributions to these forums is that not everybody shares an interested in PE, or even believe it works. Therefore, why would we want to believe anything a medical professional says about PE that at best can only be an unbiased opinion? Not to mention the guys performing the surgery will tend to disagree with any doubters.
You're absolutely right. As an example, last week I read an article on WebMD from a urologist claiming that he didn't think PE techniques worked because "It is not like the penis is elastic and can be enlarged." Before we dissect this, let me point out that I was referred to that particular article from another WebMD article (http://men.webmd.com/features/male-enhancement-is-it-worth-try?page=2) discussing how "Male Enhancement" works.
A urologist stating that the penis isn't elastic is one of the most ridiculous things that I've ever heard! The penis is one of the most elastic structures in the human body, and every man that's had a penis go from a nubby flaccid to rock-hard erection can testify to this. The very function of the human penis relies on its balloon-like properties. This same urologist even stated that using a vacuum device would not affect the size of your penis. Though mostly temporary, pumping can increase the size of your penis well above its normal proportions (http://tigerpumping.com/galleries/erections/erections.html). As you can see on that site, not all of the increase is due to edema.
I point this out to show that not everything a doctor writes is correct- especially when the tone of the article is slanted to begin with. It's misinformation like this that causes confusion among men, and the worst part of it is that this information is coming from a supposed credible, reliable source.
I find it amusing that the word ‘medicine,’ is being linked with PE, when in fact medicine has nothing to do with PE. Medicines, or drugs are preparations for the treatment or prevention of disease and illness (check your dictionaries) and by and large produced under license. The pills and potions claimed to assist in developing a bigger cock are none of these and could be manufactured under the kitchen table as far as anyone’s concerned. The idea of PE is to increase the size of your cock, or put another way, a physical procedure to increase the matter, which is achieved by some form of tension being applied to the cock itself. Perhaps, it’s realisation of it being outside the realms of medicine that prevents pharmaceutical companies becoming involved?
As for the world of medicine, it’s a huge field. You develop a problem, you visit you GP, but he doesn’t know it all? Otherwise he would cure everything there and then in his surgery, but often he’ll refer you to a specialist. When it comes to PE however, there are no specialists; true there are surgeons willing to perform procedures with the hope of increasing your size, but they’re not specialists in PE as we know it. What we do know from contributions to these forums is that not everybody shares an interested in PE, or even believe it works. Therefore, why would we want to believe anything a medical professional says about PE that at best can only be an unbiased opinion? Not to mention the guys performing the surgery will tend to disagree with any doubters.
You're absolutely right. As an example, last week I read an article on WebMD from a urologist claiming that he didn't think PE techniques worked because "It is not like the penis is elastic and can be enlarged." Before we dissect this, let me point out that I was referred to that particular article from another WebMD article (http://men.webmd.com/features/male-enhancement-is-it-worth-try?page=2) discussing how "Male Enhancement" works.
A urologist stating that the penis isn't elastic is one of the most ridiculous things that I've ever heard! The penis is one of the most elastic structures in the human body, and every man that's had a penis go from a nubby flaccid to rock-hard erection can testify to this. The very function of the human penis relies on its balloon-like properties. This same urologist even stated that using a vacuum device would not affect the size of your penis. Though mostly temporary, pumping can increase the size of your penis well above its normal proportions (http://tigerpumping.com/galleries/erections/erections.html). As you can see on that site, not all of the increase is due to edema.
I point this out to show that not everything a doctor writes is correct- especially when the tone of the article is slanted to begin with. It's misinformation like this that causes confusion among men, and the worst part of it is that this information is coming from a supposed credible, reliable source.